On Tuesday, April 19th, I went to see the screening of The Occupation of the American Mind followed by a discussion with Executive Producer Sut Jhally. The movie showed the American's point of view regarding the Palestine-Israel conflict. The media shows one side of the whole story: Israel defending its country and people by attaching the Palestinians. Western media has portrayed the Israel-Palestine conflict as a conflict revolving around security and terrorism, with Israel being the victim. Israel has the capital, the technology, and military superiority, while the Palestinians struggle to find homes. This makes Israel the colonizer and Palestine the colonized. Isreal takes more land as the conflict progresses, causing thousands of Palestinians to lose their lives and houses.
Nasri Abdilahi
Monday, May 2, 2016
Saturday, December 7, 2013
The Unsolved Melancholy
A
mother of two daughters, Muna, finally heard a noise. She took the babies to their
room to figure out what was making the noise. She realized someone was knocking
the door with his or her feet so hard. Before she headed to the door to see who
was knocking, she went to the kitchen to pick up her safety knife. “Open the
God damn door or I’ll break it myself,” said the infuriated person behind the
door.
Muna
stood in front of the door for a moment, thinking about what if that noise,
which she assumed to be a man, could force itself inside the house, rape her
and take all she has. It was midnight and screaming wouldn’t help because the
neighbours were asleep. There is no 911 to dial because that is not how the
system works in Somaliland- unrecognized independent country in the northern
side of Somalia. She had no choice because no matter what she thought about doing,
that man will his way in. She quickly went back to her bedroom, hid the knife
beneath her pillow, just in case he pushed her to the room. She opened the
door, letting the furious man get inside.
“Hey,
darling! It is cold outside and you kept me waiting?” said the intoxicated,
raging man, closing the door behind him. Muna was not able to figure out who
was knocking the door because chewing khat gave him a deeper a voice. She was
thrilled to see her husband back and started to catch her breath. “Hey, I
thought you were not coming home tonight. What happened to you? Where were you
all night?” she asks her husband, waiting for an answer that he cannot give
her. He grabbed her and forced her to the bedroom; forcing his body on her
while throwing punches at her.
Her
husband, who was later sent to jail for his horrendous actions, and many other
Somalis are the victims of an addictive drug, khat, in Somaliland. That night, her husband was sitting with his
friends in a Maqaaxi, a small house made out of old clothes where 80% of men in
Somaliland spend a quality amount of time, chewing khat, “The Somali
Marijuana,” as most Somalis call it. Khat is a green plant that is mostly
imported from Ethiopia. Due to the lack of jobs in Somaliland, chewing khat is
what young people believe to be the “Camal la aan”, meaning “the alternative”
to working. They leave their homes early in the morning, sit in a Maqaaxi, and
go back to their homes at midnight inebriated. During that time, they do
nothing beside chew khat, smoke, and waste time. Hassan Muse, a phenomenal
reporter discussed in his article, Negative
effects of qat threaten next generation of Somali, the difficulties and the
hardships a 25year -old Mohmad Abdi Sardeye faced. He was a resident of Garowe,
a city in the northwest of Somalia where he spent most of his life. “I started
to chew [khat] when I graduated from high school. Youth have no jobs to keep
them occupied. Only a few work, while the rest hang around the streets. I use
it to pass time until I find work." Many people like Mohamed Abdi are
naive about the effects khat has on their health, but they do it to “kill time”
or as many of them say, “Wakhtigaan ku dilayaa!”
Chewing
khat shuts down the user’s brain and makes him hallucinate frequently. It gives
you the power to harm people and destroy marriages. It also harms your health
rapidly. According to the Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine’s
research, “the mechanical and chemical irritation may result in the development
of mucosal white lesions and dark pigmentation.” Khat chewing may reduce
aspects related to risk of “gingival and periodontal inflammation”, a non
destructive disease that affects the alveolar bone, “but it appears to be
associated with attachment loss at the site of chewing.” Chewing khat triggers some internal and
external teeth stains which later lead to discoloration of teeth and triggers
tooth decay. It induces a state of euphoria, elation and takes away your memory.
According to SomalilandPress, an extensively read newspaper in Somaliland,
report that 5-10% of the families in Somaliland lost their marriages due to
khat issues. Men come back home late and high, then rape and beat their wives
and children, destroy their houses or end up hurting themselves. Therefore,
most people are concerned about the damages khat does to the future of this
country. The more men chew khat and not help Somaliland get a better future,
the less opportunities for Somaliland to get its recognition.
Despite
the harms khat does to the health of its victims, destroys marriages and
threatens the future of Somaliland, the entire economy of the country depends
on it. According to SomalilandPress, “khat does a bustling trade estimated at
well over $50 million annually.” However, it further discussed how “55% of young men and women aged 20 years
and younger use khat, even as they attend high school.” Selling, buying, using
khat is legal in Somaliland. However, even though Somaliland gets millions
of dollars from exporting khat to UK, Yemen and other countries, most of its
youth are either in jail or in hospitals. There are no available jobs for them so
they end up robbing people or shops then later go to jail or chew khat all day
and night then later taken by an ambulance. Throughout the last ten years, over
50% of the youth in Somaliland are victimized by khat.
Khat
is problematic to the Somaliland government. If the government averts people from chewing khat
by creating laws that will make it illegal or stop importing it from Ethiopia,
the economy will decline and many people will lose their jobs but if it lets
people chew khat, more young people will be addicted to it and problems and
chaos will occur regularly. Since 1960, when Somaliland got its independence
from Somalia, Somaliland is trying to sustain its economy, peace, and the government’s
capability in governing the country. However, dealing with khat is more
challenging than anticipated.
Khat is a struggle that is hard to overcome
and many single or widow mothers tend to suffer from it a lot. Losing her
husband just because he spent the night chewing khat, pushed Muna to live and
move to the streets. She didn’t have a job. Her husband was the only hope she
had but now that she lost him, she had to take her babies and beg for money in
the streets. She went to a court to fight not for her survival but for her
babies’ survival. She went to the only court she thought would help and begged
the judge to release her husband or sign her money so she and her babies can
survive while he is gone to prison. After the case was closed, most people were
angered by the judge’s decision; leaving the hapless mother with no choice but
to go back to the streets. She left court
with tears falling off her eyes, just wishing if khat could one day be
forbidden from the country. She went back to the streets to continue fighting
for the survival of her babies. With khat around, the economy will boom but a
lot of people will lose loved once, houses, marriages, jobs, and even surviving
in the country will be an ordeal. The existence and the future of this country depend
on the choice the government will make; banning khat from the country or letting
its people struggle and fight for survival.
Bibliography
Gorsky, Meir. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
15 9 2004. 12 11 2013 <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2669459/>.
Hussein, Hassan Muse. http://sabahionline.com/. 29 9
2012. 10 11 2013
<http://sabahionline.com/en_GB/articles/hoa/articles/features/2012/10/29/feature-01>.
somalilandpress. 11 5 2009. 10 11 2013
<http://somalilandpress.com/somalilands-addict-economy-khat-drains-struggling-economy-7319>.
Does Technology Affect Our Brain?
In
his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Nickolas Carr-an author wh0 mainly
writes about technology, culture and economics-argues that technology is
changing our minds and that it negatively affects the ways we process
information. Like the title advocates, Carr frequently reiterates how and why
technology is taking over the human mind. The article is effectively persuasive
because he uses personal experiences to show that people can lose concentration
because of computers, disapproves the ideas of the founders of Google, and cites
scholars who criticized technological advancement and had similar arguments
ingrained with relatable analogies and imagery. Carr does this to convince his
readers and show them how technologies and internet have a huge negative impact
on the human mind.
Carr
uses personal experiences to foreshadow the significance of his loss of
concentration. Carr discusses that even as a writer, his mind struggles to keep
concentrated on a book. He censures and blames the internet for his mind’s
struggle and describes it as, “the perfect recall of silicon memory.” By this,
Carr means that we take in information from the Internet without taking the
time to understand and process information. The Internet takes away the time to
fully understand information. In addition, processing information requires
understanding and understanding information strengthens our way of interpreting
information and use it in a more efficient way.
For instance, Carr uses an example of scuba diver verses Jet Ski to show
that he skims articles instead of fully getting deep into the significant parts
of the articles. Furthermore, after seeing many other people struggle to keep
focused on a book without “getting fidget, losing the thread or looking for
something else to do”, Carr realizes that “the Net is becoming a universal
medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and
ears and into my mind.”
Moreover,
Carr discusses that the founders of Google wanted to create Artificial
Intelligence and believed that the quicker we get information, the more
beneficial we can be. Sergey Brin, one of the founders of Google, stated that
“if you had all the world’s information directly attached to your brain, or an
artificial brain that was smarter than your brain, you’d be better off.”
However, Carr argues that reading a text thoroughly without using skimming
activities will promote the knowledge we obtain from that text. He says that
“the last thing these companies want is to encourage leisurely reading or slow,
concentrated thought. It’s in their economic interest to drive us to
distraction.” Carr is more convincing because companies do not help us benefit
from information directly linked to our brains but instead help themselves gain
more profit and expand their businesses by advertising their service instead of
giving us useful information. Having information directly linked to your brain
is taking away our thinking process and we are better off to spend hours on a
book and take in meaningful information.
Carr cites scientific studies and scholars who had similar
beliefs and skepticism about technology as he does. He examines- and later finds out- that Socrates feared people
will depend on written words, instead of carrying knowledge or wisdom inside
their heads. He states that people will “receive a quantity of information
without proper instruction” and “[fill] with the conceit of wisdom instead of
real wisdom.” By this, Carr means that most people will read too much
information online without fully learning and getting insightful thoughts and
massages. The more people spend less time on books, the less knowledge they
will obtain from them. This proves Carr’s point that the internet is changing
the way we process information.
In addition, Carr argues that internet is
changing how we read and interpret text or information. He examines
neurological and psychological experiments performed by scholars to back it up
and show how internet use affects cognition. He reviews a
research conducted by scholars from University College London which suggests
that we might change the way we think and read articles. The scholars
scrutinized the behaviours of visitors to two popular sites, finding that most
of them favored using skimming activities to read those articles so they can
read and comprehend them faster. As technology progresses, skimming through
articles became a routine for many people. Because technology offers too much
information, spending more time on articles or information became a struggle.
People do not want to focus on one article while many others are available;
therefore, understanding information thoroughly is lost. The scholars found out
that people who use these sites read no more than one or two pages of a book or
article. To prove their point, the scholars came to a convincing conclusion,
which is that “users are not reading online in the traditional sense; indeed
there are signs that new forms of “reading” are emerging as users “power
browse” horizontally through titles, contents pages and abstracts going for
quick wins. It almost seems that they go online to avoid reading in the
traditional sense.” Their conclusion demonstrates the lost of traditional
reading-reading a book from page one to last-through technology. And the easy
availability of technology gives more information to people, in which they
struggle to choose one type of information or article and understand and
process efficiently.
Carr’s article is convincing because Internet and
technological advancement really influence how our brain functions and trigger
distractions. Carr’s essay persuasively shows
why and how technology and Internet is affecting our brain and backs it up
correctly with personal experiences full of insightful arguments, condemns the
founders of Google’s ideas, and cites scholars who had similar criticism of technological
advancement.
Work
Cited
Carr, Nickolas. (July 1, 2008).
Is Google Making Us Stupid. Retrieved
December 4, 2013 from: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/
Thursday, September 5, 2013
My Weaknesses and strengths as a Writer
I believe that
being able to distinguish our own strengths and weaknesses as writers can help
us become better individuals in our writing. Knowing yourself as a writer and what
you can do or can’t do, can help you recognize and overcome your weaknesses.
As a writer,
one of my greatest strengths is the ability to organize my paper well and. whenever
I get an essay to write, I write the important things first and the least
important things last. This helps me write faster while thinking thoroughly
about the prompt or the question that is been asked. Also, it helps me hand in
my work on time and organize it well. In addition to that, another strength I
have is being patient and not giving up whenever I face obstacles, such as having
no ideas at all or having tens of other work to do. Whenever an obstacle
arrives, I leave my room and avoid thinking about the paper because being away
from the paper for awhile gives me the time to relax and most of the times more
ideas flow in.
Every writer
has some problems or weaknesses in his or her writing. One of my weaknesses is the
luck of vocabulary. In order to become a greater writer, having the ability to
use vocabularies correctly in a sentence is an essential skill to have. Also,
another weakness I have is the ability to think in English in my head and then
put all of my ideas on a paper. I started learning English four years ago so I
still struggle in that task. Finally, my only saving grace is I still want to
learn these skills and overcome my weaknesses.
Shooting an Elephant: George Orwell-Summary
The narrator,
who we presumed to be the author of Shooting
an Elephant, George Orwell, talks
about being a police officer in Moulmein, Burma, a town where “[he] was hated
by large numbers of people.” Being a police officer during a tense of
anti-European sentiment made him a target and a symbol of the cruel colonial
power, the British, even thought his beliefs and supports go towards the
Burmese. Every day, he wakes up to be mocked by the people whose his
intellectual sympathies lie with.
Shooting an Elephant reached its
climax when the narrator was informed that an elephant lost control under the
attack of “must” was “ravaging the bazaar” Taking his rifle, “an old .44
Winchester” the narrator went to finish his mission, killing an elephant, along
with a few thousand people. The elephant’s mahout, the person who controls the
elephant, went the wrong direction, and it will take him awhile to go to the
elephant’s whereabouts and cool it down. Therefore, the police officer has to
do something about the elephant whether it is shooting it down or letting it
live peacefully. A decision has to be made and the police officer gets so much
pressure from his surroundings that it wasn’t permissible for him to think
clearly. After all, putting bullets in the elephant’s heart seemed to be the
only option he had. After a long time full of struggle and pain, it took the
police officer five bullets to put the massive elephant down. Ultimately, at
the end of the story the narrator confesses that he killed the elephant not to
protect the elephant from hurting more people or destroying more properties but
so that people can stop mocking him for working the oppressive imperial.
Sunday, February 3, 2013
My First you tube Video
Full HD Liverpool vs Arsenal 2-2 2013 All Goals & Highlights 30/1/2013
-
I chose this because...
- It is an awesome
- Arsenal dominted the game
- It made me support Arsenal more and more because of the effort they showed..
Arsenal
- "
Arsenal
Football Club is an English Premier League football club based in Holloway, London. One of the most successful clubs in English football, it has won 13 First Division and Premier League titles and 10 FA Cups."
GFE, Gunners Forever and it will last till the end...
| Arsenal's Best Player | Position |
|---|---|
| Theo Wallcot | Forward |
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)